top of page

Rental Housing Weekly Briefing: July 13–17, 2026

Rental Housing Weekly Briefing, July 6-10, 2026, over a modern apartment building with Chandan Economics logo.

This week’s Rental Housing Weekly Briefing examines RealPage data showing that apartment demand and occupancy improved in the second quarter as new supply continued to pull back, alongside Trepp analysis showing that Sun Belt multifamily credit stress remains elevated but more nuanced than headline regional comparisons suggest, and Chandan Economics research on why work-from-home renters have become less rent-burdened since 2020.

LAST WEEK in RENTAL HOUSING 

Apartment Market Fundamentals via RealPage

  • Apartment demand strengthened in the second quarter, according to RealPage Market Analytics. The US absorbed more than 187,000 apartment units from April through June, a pace that was notably above average for the typically strong spring leasing season. Still, annual demand totaled about 271,300 units, below the decade average of roughly 340,000 units.

  • Supply pressure is beginning to ease. Roughly 340,200 units delivered across the US in the year ending Q2 2026, dropping below the decade norm for the first time in three years. Annual supply has now declined for six consecutive quarters after peaking near 588,000 units in late 2024.

  • Occupancy has started to recover as deliveries slow, reaching 95.5% in Q2. That marked the second consecutive quarterly increase and put occupancy slightly above its decade average, though it remained down 20 basis points from a year earlier.

  • Rent growth improved sequentially, but the recovery remains uneven. Effective asking rents rose 1.4% in Q2 but remained 0.2% below year-earlier levels, while concessions were still offered at 24.6% of apartments. Regionally, the South remained the only US region with annual rent declines and occupancy below 95%, while tech-oriented coastal markets continued to lead rent growth.



Regional Multifamily Credit Stress via Trepp

  • Regional multifamily credit conditions remain more complicated than the simple Sun Belt-versus-Midwest narrative suggests. Trepp’s analysis finds that Sun Belt multifamily markets continue to face near-term pressure from elevated supply, concessions, and rent compression, while many Midwest markets have benefited from steadier occupancy, less new supply, and comparatively better headline performance.

  • The credit data show a real but uneven gap. Normalized by each region’s CMBS loan pool, Trepp finds that the Sun Belt has a 6.9% multifamily watchlist rate, compared with 3.0% in the Midwest, and a 1.1% special servicing rate, compared with 0.6% in the Midwest. Those differences point to more visible early-stage stress across Sun Belt loans.

  • However, the gap largely disappears at the more severe end of the distress spectrum. Serious delinquency rates are nearly identical across the two regions, at 2.9% for Sun Belt multifamily CMBS loans and 2.8% for Midwest loans. That suggests the Midwest’s credit advantage is concentrated more in early-stage stress indicators than in actual loan resolution outcomes.

  • The broader takeaway is that regional risk is not one-dimensional. The Midwest may offer lower volatility in select stabilized assets, but its “safe haven” appeal appears more conditional than universal. Meanwhile, the Sun Belt remains under pressure from the recent supply wave, but Trepp argues that its longer-term demand drivers continue to support the region’s investment case once supply-demand conditions normalize.



Work From Home and Rental Affordability via Chandan Economics

  • Chandan Economics’ latest analysis finds that renter households working from home have carried lower median rent burdens than non-WFH renter households since 2020. In 2019, median rent burdens were nearly identical between the two groups, at 25.5% for WFH renter households and 25.7% for non-WFH renter households. By 2024, the gap had widened to 24.8% versus 27.6%, respectively.

  • However, the affordability improvement does not appear to be driven by WFH renters paying lower rents. In 2024, the median monthly gross rent among WFH renter households was $1,900, compared with $1,560 for non-WFH renter households. That cuts against the idea that remote work primarily improved affordability by allowing renters to move into cheaper housing or lower-cost markets.

  • Instead, the data point to an income composition effect. Median household income among WFH renter households rose from $66,800 in 2019 to $90,000 in 2024, while the median among non-WFH renter households increased from $54,000 to $65,500. Higher-income renters were also more likely to work from home, with 16.2% of renter households earning at least $75,000 working remotely in 2024, compared with 8.8% of those earning below $75,000.

  • The bottom line is that remote work changed rental affordability patterns, but not mainly by reducing rents. WFH renters became less rent-burdened because the WFH renter pool became more affluent, while non-WFH renter households became relatively more concentrated among workers with lower incomes and less workplace flexibility.


CHANDAN ECONOMICS in the NEWS




THE WEEK AHEAD 

July 14, 2026

  • Consumer Price Index (Bureau of Labor Statistics)

July 15, 2026

  • Producer Price Index (Bureau of Labor Statistics)

July 16, 2026

  • Zillow Observed Rent Index (Zillow)

  • Primary Mortgage Survey (Freddie Mac)


© 2026, Chandan Economics LLC

  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
bottom of page